Here’s the situation: two routers are connected with two interfaces, one is FastEthernet0/1 and the other one is Dialer1 (which is a bundle of two Serial interfaces).
We’re using RIP to connect these two routers:
ip subnet-zero ip classless router rip version 2 network 10.0.0.0 no auto-summary
Fa0/1 is experiencing some hardware problems, so we want to prefer Di1 instead while we investigate the issue, but still we want to be able to fail over Fa0/1 in the meantime.
Each routing protocol has ways to set “priorities” somehow. Being RIP a vector-distance routing protocol, it makes selections based on how many hops you need, somehow like BGP counting Autonomous Systems in the AS path.
Here’s the solution:
router rip offset-list 0 in 1 FastEthernet0/1 offset-list 0 out 1 FastEthernet0/1
The first command says: “take all the routes received from Fa0/1 and add 1 hop to the count”. The second command does the same when sending other routes to other router over that interface. That 0 in the middle stands for “all routes”, but we can also have the number of an access-list, if you want to alter specific routes instead.
What happens next?
The RIP protocol ends up excluding Fa0/1 at all:
R1#show ip rip database 0.0.0.0/0 auto-summary 10.0.0.0/8 auto-summary 10.2.0.0/30 directly connected, FastEthernet0/0 10.2.0.4/30 directly connected, FastEthernet0/1 10.2.0.8/30 directly connected, Dialer1 10.2.0.10/32 directly connected, Dialer1 10.2.0.12/30 [1] via 10.2.0.10, 00:00:21, Dialer1 10.2.255.1/32 directly connected, Loopback0 10.2.255.2/32 [1] via 10.2.0.10, 00:00:21, Dialer1 10.2.255.3/32 [2] via 10.2.0.10, 00:00:21, Dialer1
But still, when Di1 goes down, failover works:
R1#show ip rip database 0.0.0.0/0 auto-summary 10.0.0.0/8 auto-summary 10.2.0.0/30 directly connected, FastEthernet0/0 10.2.0.4/30 directly connected, FastEthernet0/1 10.2.0.8/30 is possibly down 10.2.0.10/32 is possibly down 10.2.0.12/30 [2] via 10.2.0.6, 00:00:26, FastEthernet0/1 10.2.255.1/32 directly connected, Loopback0 10.2.255.2/32 [2] via 10.2.0.6, 00:00:26, FastEthernet0/1 10.2.255.3/32 [3] via 10.2.0.6, 00:00:26, FastEthernet0/1
Note the two routes showing as “possibly down”, as related to Di1.
Leave a Reply